Deductions
- economic bad has quality superclass ⇐ (economic bad has quality abstract entity), (abstract entity has quality superclass), (has quality is a transitive relation)
- economic bad has quality class ⇐ (abstract entity is a class), (economic bad has quality abstract entity)
- economic bad has quality superclass ⇐ (economic bad has quality abstract entity), (abstract entity has quality superclass), (has quality is a transitive relation)
- economic bad has quality taxonomic rank ⇐ (economic bad has quality abstract entity), (abstract entity has quality taxonomic rank), (has quality is a transitive relation)
- economic bad has quality abstract entity ⇐ (type is a abstract entity), (economic bad has quality type)
- economic bad has quality entity ⇐ (type is a entity), (economic bad has quality type)
- social science concept is for example economic bad ⇐ (economic bad is a social science concept), (is a is inverse of is for example)
- economic concept is for example economic bad ⇐ (economic bad is a economic concept), (is a is inverse of is for example)
- economic bad is a social science concept ⇐ (economic concept is subclass of social science concept), (economic bad is a economic concept)
- economic bad has quality type of object ⇐ (economic bad is subclass of object), (object has quality type of object)
- economic bad has quality type ⇐ (economic bad is subclass of object), (object has quality type)
- economic bad has quality existence ⇐ (economic bad is subclass of object), (object has quality existence)
- economic bad is a economic concept ⇐ (goods is a economic concept), (goods is opposite of economic bad)
- economics term is for example economic bad ⇐ (economic bad is a economics term), (is a is inverse of is for example)
- economic bad is opposite of goods ⇐ goods is opposite of economic bad