Deductions
- sociological concept is for example impotence ⇐ (impotence is a sociological concept), (is a is inverse of is for example)
- concept is for example impotence ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (is a is inverse of is for example)
- impotence has quality criterion ⇐ (impotence has quality mathematical object), (mathematical object has quality criterion), (has quality is a transitive relation)
- impotence has quality property ⇐ (impotence has quality mathematical object), (mathematical object has quality property), (has quality is a transitive relation)
- impotence has quality type ⇐ (impotence has quality mathematical object), (mathematical object has quality type), (has quality is a transitive relation)
- impotence has quality quality ⇐ (impotence has quality mathematical object), (mathematical object has quality quality), (has quality is a transitive relation)
- impotence has quality type of property ⇐ (impotence has quality mathematical object), (mathematical object has quality type of property), (has quality is a transitive relation)
- impotence has quality class ⇐ (impotence has quality mathematical object), (mathematical object has quality class), (has quality is a transitive relation)
- impotence has quality mathematical property ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality mathematical property)
- impotence has quality extension of a concept ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality extension of a concept)
- impotence has quality mathematical object ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality mathematical object)
- impotence has quality taxonomic rank ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality taxonomic rank)
- impotence has quality superclass ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality superclass)
- impotence has quality class ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality class)
- impotence has quality set ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality set)
- impotence has quality relation ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality relation)
- impotence has quality existence ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality existence)
- impotence has quality entity ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality entity)
- impotence has quality abstract entity ⇐ (impotence is a concept), (concept has quality abstract entity)
- impotence is a sociological concept ⇐ (power is a sociological concept), (power is opposite of impotence)